User talk:Dsajdshhg

As much as we might judge people for their bad spelling, the truth is that English spelling doesn't make any goddamn sense. Just look at that sentence: Why is there an "n" but no "n" sound in "goddamn"? It turns out there's one perfectly good reason for that and many other eccentricities of the language, and that one good reason is actually a bunch of stupid reasons that are all shitty and terrible. Like.

5. "O" and "U" (and "C" and "K") Sound the Same Because of Sloppy HandwritingWriting has become second nature to us, so it's easy to forget how schizophrenic the letter "o" is. You get the word "con," where its sound is basically "aw," but then in "son" it's encroaching on "u" territory, and that's a good way to get your face cut ("u" don't take no shit). Then you have "comb" and "tomb," which are totally different "o" sounds despite having no right to be. Then there are phrases like "some honey tongue" and.

It all comes down to sloppy handwriting.iphone 5s refurbished In medieval times, highly stylized writing focused on the "minims," or vertical lines in a letter, and the smudgy nature of ink. For example, "in," "ni," "m," "iii," "ui," and "iu" might all look exactly the same because the horizontal lines written into each letter were so thin, they tended to smudge or just fade away. For example, this:

This says "animal," like you fancy yourself in the sack, or "annnal," which is a rather annoying way to ask for it, or "aiiuiiai," which is the sound you're going to make when you head for your partner's fire door without permission and get punched in the throat. The solution to all this buggery was to just stop using "u" for some words, like "some," "love," and "come," and wow, we just cannot get out of the gutter here. This is the reason why you see an "o" for a "u" sound when it's next to an "n" or an "m," like in "monkey" and "ton," and also why you see a "c" before a "k" when the letter appears next to more minims. The "c" was a good way to separate the "k" from letters it could be easily confused with, which led to spellings such as "lick" and "flick" and.

4. Some Words Are Spelled Wrong Because Academics Are Pretentious JerkwadsEvery once in a while English words will have silent letters in them  like "receipt," "debt," "scissor," and "island." And there's actually a really interesting explanation for that: English teachers hate you and want you to fail. Why else is the language so littered with invisible minefields of perceived stupidity?"I contain 19 words that have a 'q' not followed by a 'u.' Enjoy guessing, motherfucker."

Over the last 500 years, there's been a continuing effort to standardize all spelling  and a lot of the stuffy academic types making the rules made a real mess of it. In the 16th century, the people decided to insert a "b" into "debt" and "doubt" to remind everyone that they had evolved from the Latin word "debitum"  even though the preferred spellings, "dette" and "doute," made way more sense. But hey, at least the common man would forever be reminded of precious Latin, thus ensuring that it would never become a dead langua oh wait, no, it died more completely than an engineer on the away team, didn't it? The academics did the exact same thing with "receipt" (then spelled "receit," but drawn from the Latin word "recepta") and smugly smirked down at generations of dyslexics accidentally writing "recipe."

"You've never heard of the silent 'x'? Enjoy your mainstream spelling, sheeple."

Changing the spelling to match the Latin origin is at least mildly understandable, if kind of a dick move  but less understandable is changing spellings to match Latin words they have nothing to do with, which also happened.

At least they resisted the urge to use that stupid font.

The origin of the word "island" is the Old English word "yland" or "iland," but since the Latin word "insula" has a similar meaning, academics decided to just throw an "s" in there, because more Latin = more smarter. That one was so influential that it actually changed the word for the central walkway in a church  up until then spelled "aile"   to "aisle," because "s" is friggin' sexy, we guess. All those curves. Go ahead and toss it in there. Liven that sucker up.

3. The Difference Between " el" and " le" Is Due to Stubbornly Clinging to TraditionActually, there are no rules here at all. This is the Thunderdome of English spelling. You know what? That's not even fair. The Thunderdome had at least one rule. This shit is way worse: Some words that end in an "L" sound are spelled " el" ("novel," "level," "cancel"), and some are spelled " le" ("little," "cable," "purple").

Not that Thunderdome stuck to the two man rule too closely either.

Most words that end in " el" used to have the stress carried on that last syllable (so "angel" used to be pronounced "ang EL"). As the language evolved, those pronunciations slowly blended together, but we still clung to the old spellings for no reason other than tradition, which apparently doesn't count for pronunciation as well.

No, really: One of the most frustrating and counterintuitive quirks to our language exists. There's no practical reason, no aesthetic reason, no etymological quirk. It's just some leftover fat dangling off the side of our language like a syntactic appendix. The only use it has now is to help prospective employers distinguish between people who were able to take SAT prep courses and those who weren't, primarily so they can tell the latter that they're just not Waffle House material.http://www.iphonereplacementscreen.top